Photos courtesy of Frank Kouwenhoven.
English Version
Dutch sinologist Mr. Frank Kouwenhoven has been conducting fieldwork in China since the 1980s, gaining firsthand experience and deep insight into traditional Chinese music, including music of China's ethnic minorities. The journal CHIME, which he founded in Europe, has a history of over 30 years. As an academic publication focused on music, it has made notable contributions to the dissemination, summarization, and study of Chinese music.
Time has passed, and by the mid-2020s, Mr. Kouwenhoven reunites with old friends — composer Professor Dong Kui, Hollywood music producer Hong Wang, and cultural scholar Zang Na. Together, they reflect on the past and contemplate the present, letting their thoughts soar. With Mr. Kouwenhoven’s decades of research experience as a foundation, this cross-cultural dialogue seeks to jointly promote the development of contemporary Chinese music.
Those Years: Stories from the Field
Dong Kui: Hello, Professor Kouwenhoven! We’ve prepared a few questions for you. Let’s start with your fieldwork in China. You've done quite a few music field studies here. Which one left the deepest impression?
Frank Kouwenhoven: Honestly, every trip was deeply memorable. I’ve never been disappointed. I remember back in 1986, my wife, Antoinet (Shi Niejie in Chinese), was studying at Nanjing University, and I planned to join her in the field. We actually met in the Netherlands. Both of us were music lovers, mainly interested in Western music at the time. Later, she came to China to study Chinese music and lyric-writing techniques.
Back then, when I traveled to China, I knew nothing about China. My biggest concern was that I would arrive at the airport in Beijing, and wouldn’t be able to speak a word of Chinese. I didn’t even know how to ask the way to the restroom. It felt like an adventure.
My wife came to meet me at the airport. She had somehow passed through customs and was waiting for me. We hugged, but then she told me she didn’t have her passport with her! The customs officer was totally shocked, but still let her through. That moment made me feel this was a truly friendly country. I thought, the people were relaxed and welcoming. I felt at home, like I could really find my place here.
The first few years were fantastic. I was totally enraptured by fieldwork! But there were still so many things I didn’t understand. The songs and lyrics we collected, the people we talked to. It was all completely different from the world I knew. I remember one winter in particular. It was in the middle of a very cold period. So, we decided to take a little holiday trip in Yunnan. If you ask me about an experience that totally knocked me over going to the countryside, I’d say it was village life in Yunnan. It’s a warm, beautiful place. The women all dressed up in these incredibly colorful costumes while working in the fields. No one made them do it, it was just how they lived.
By the way, whenever I tried to take photos of them, they’d just run away, shy, but charming. I thought, “Spending my life traveling, meeting people, talking with them ! What could be better?”
It’s been nearly 40 years since then, and my passion hasn’t faded. Around that time, my wife and I also met Hong Wang, and we did some fieldwork together.
Dong Kui: Hong Wang, you’ve worked with Professor Kouwenhoven in the field. Can you tell us a bit about that?
Hong Wang: Sure. At the time, I was working as an editor at an arts research institute in China, helping with transcription and proofreading for the Collection of Chinese Ethnic and Folk Music series. The problem was, our education was in Western music , even though I’d played erhu as a kid, I was made to switch to oboe in college! So I didn’t know much about folk music either.
The first time I heard Tongzi Opera from Nantong, Jiangsu, I had no clue what it was. But after a few months, I really started to fall in love with it. It’s such an authentic expression of Chinese music. Later on, I had the chance to teach overseas students at Nanjing University, which is where I met Antoinet and Frank.
Frank Kouwenhoven: Yes, I’ve collaborated with many scholars over the years, otherwise we wouldn’t have had the chance to meet and do fieldwork together in Suzhou. Wang, do you remember our time there? You were working on the folk music collection project and shared a lot with us.
But actually, I want to share a completely unrelated story from that trip, which was totally crazy. We were by Lake Taihu, with orange trees lining the lake. The water looked almost like the ocean. Antoinet and I wanted to swim. The water was shallow, so we had to keep walking further out. We weren’t wearing swimsuits, so of course, people started gathering to watch us. They thought we were completely nuts!
Hong Wang: They probably just thought you’d fallen into the lake.
Frank Kouwenhoven: In the woods near the lake, you could hear working songs and labor chants everywhere. People loved singing. It’s interesting: many regional song traditions seem to originate from places where agriculture began early. That’s true all over the world. The land we were standing on had such deep musical roots. The kind of songs that capture the essence of Chinese musical culture. I often wonder how these musical forms evolved from such rudimentary origins. The folk performers had this amazing freedom. Their music was expressive and full of emotional power. I couldn’t always understand the lyrics, but their voices were moving. And honestly, these kinds of performances can never be truly captured on a recording, because that was rooted in environment and moment.
Dong Kui: So 1986 was your first field trip to China. What about your last one before Covid?
Frank Kouwenhoven: I did manage a short trip before the pandemic hit, and Hong Wang kindly joined us again. We interviewed artists performing Yangzhou Qingqu and Yangzhou Tanci, and we met the Yangju master Lu Xiaojie. We also visited music scholars in Nanjing.
But then I thought it’s such a pity that my wife and I actually did ten years of fieldwork in Gansu. Later, she passed away. It was a terrible loss. Even in her final days, we were still discussing our field notes. She wanted me to keep going.
After she died, I wasn’t sure I’d ever return to China. She had been my translator,and her Chinese was much better than mine. I picked up a bit, but never became fluent. I thought maybe I could go back to the countryside, but it’s tough, the dialects are incredibly difficult.
Around 2016, I took a Chinese friend with me back to Gansu. We attended a temple fair and tried to do some interviews. But I couldn’t understand what people were saying. They were speaking nonstop, and even my Chinese friend couldn’t follow. The local dialects were just too much.
Still, I’m really glad I took that step. If I get the chance, I’d love to continue.
Those People: A Requiem for the Departed
Dong Kui: It’s wonderful that we can keep this going! So, compared to the 1980s, what changes have you noticed in China during fieldwork? You must have a lot of first-hand experiences.
Frank Kouwenhoven: Compared to forty years ago, today’s China is incredibly dynamic. The pace of development is just unbelievable. But over these past decades, so much traditional culture has faded away, especially music. I once went back to Jiangnan to record folk songs and realized that much of the original material was not available anymore. What people sang to me were either petrified versions or version of songs they had learned in school. But that’s not the same thing! You know, the songs they learned are fixed, structured, kind of like the music you compose. They might have been taught using numbered notation or other systems, but every time they perform them, it’s the same lyrics, same melody.
Whereas no folk singers would ever do that. They never reproduce a song the same way twice, because that music is dynamic, it’s improvising, it’s dynamic.
In Jiangnan, this kind of situation, with only petrified versions of songs being sung, is already quite common. And tourism has a bad impact, too. In places like Gansu, for example, the temple fairs we visited in the '90s still exist, but now they’ve turned into more of a tourist attraction. A lot of people from outside visit, and there are all kinds of stage shows. But those organized shows really have very little to do with the whole original framework in which these sample festivals took place. So yes, I honestly feel that a lot of the truly interesting things are disappearing.
Dong Kui: What you’re describing isn’t just happening in China. It’s a global phenomenon. As we march into a tech age, that process is only going to accelerate. Frank, do you see this kind of evolution pushed by technology as positive or negative? I know it’s a bit of a pop up question, but I find this question fascinating.
Frank Kouwenhoven: You know, I do feel a deep sadness about the massive loss of traditional culture, because it was powerful, it really spoke.
Much of what I see in urban context today feels fake, shallow, and so meaningless. Of course, this isn’t unique to China, we have all that in the west as well. There is no argument about it. Yes, tradition inevitably fades, and culture needs to reinvent, evolve, adapt. That’s a natural process, and of course it’s a good process. But I felt sad at the bottom of my heart for the people who were gone.
I always feel like Antoinet is very much inside me, not in a romantic sense, but just... we have been together for such a long time that I feel I’m constantly communicating with her or maybe talking to the clouds, or to heaven. I know exactly what she would say in certain situations, what she would think. That reverberates in me. So when I say I’ve lost something, it’s not just my wife.
It’s also all those singers we recorded with. Those friendships, those close ties, have vanished along with the people themselves. To be honest, their passing hurts more than the loss of the songs.
I think nowadays, a lot of folk music exists only within conservatories or music departments, under the supervision of professors. But that’s a very narrow space. Culture can’t thrive in a narrow space. You have to open the windows. There has to be exchange. Tradition has to change, it has to renew itself.
And I think there is something that was available in traditional culture. Back then, they did travel, they did share ideas and music in a very natural way. It was a low-key culture and wasn’t affected that much by politics, and it grew more naturally. These days, I focus more on big cities like Shanghai, where you find some really interesting artists and fascinating musicians. But I feel they’re developing under great pressure—it’s hard for them to have the same kind of freedom, natural growth that people had in the countryside.
Dong Kui: My memory of a fieldtrip dates back to when I was at the conservatory as a student. During winter or summer breaks, we did a full trip to collect music. I remember once, we stumbled upon a funeral on a mountaintop in Yunnan. I stayed there all night. There was a group of elderly women singing songs that felt like they were calling to the soul, or maybe sending it to heaven. I don’t remember the melody anymore, but I remember the texture of the sound, and the environment. I still draw inspiration from that memory. It moved me deeply.
Hong Wang: The loss of tradition is truly heartbreaking! While I was in Beijing, a well-known music producer, Lu Zhongqiang, invited me to work on a series of recordings for the Guoyue Revival Project, a collaboration between Beijing Thirteenth Month Culture Communication Company and China Record Group. These were cross-cultural projects involving musicians from different countries, using different musical languages to “talk” to each other, and we created some very innovative works in the new "national style" (新国风).
Through this work, I realized just how important traditional music is. To truly revive it, you have to go into the field. For instance, I went to places like Guizhou and Inner Mongolia to do field recordings. I also had deep conversations with a much younger Mongolian university student named Naqin. Through her, I learned a lot about ethnic minority music I’d never known before. I encouraged her to do fieldwork back in her hometown, Ordos. She told me she had failed her first attempt at the doctoral entrance exam during the pandemic. I said, "Don’t worry! Go home first. Maybe this is heaven giving you time to do fieldwork." And she really did! She went and interviewed a famous folk artist, and ended up getting stuck at his home due to lockdowns. So she stayed and learned in depth. Now she’s back at Minzu University of China doing her PhD, and I’m sure that experience in the field will prove incredibly valuable.
Those Things: Frank Kouwenhoven and Peking Opera
Dong Kui: Your wife is a sinologist, and you both decided to collect folk songs. You seem to have a strong interest in the music of Chinese ethnic minorities. From your perspective, how would you define ethnic minority music in China? How is it different from Han music?
Frank Kouwenhoven: I’m not a big fan of drawing such distinctions, to be honest, it can lead to misconception. I think people living in particular regions of China can be identified through things like clothing, food, and language. But the diversity within the Han majority itself is far beyond what people often assume. If I go to Gansu, people will identify me as a foreigner. But they would not consider someone from Shanghai as one of their own either. They view people from other parts of the country just as much as strangers.
China is highly regionalized. If you dig deeper, I’d say there are easily over a hundred ethnic minorities in China. Sometimes they blend into each other, and sometimes they remain distinct. You have to explore. There’s fantastic culture everywhere.
Dong Kui: In China, people often say that Chinese traditional music is “universal,” that it belongs to the world. Do you think Chinese music is global, or are there distinct musical dialects?
Hong Wang: I’m often confused about the idea of “music.” I mean, do you know what music is? Why don’t you listen to Irish music every day, or Mongolian music? Because you're not familiar with the language. Everyone has their own musical “language” that they prefer.
Frank Kouwenhoven: Exactly. That’s the point. Music is not a universal language. It’s like spoken language: it’s a vast field with many different systems, and you could even call them dialects.
To really understand any type of music, you have to invest in it. You need to learn about it, learn how to enjoy it, or discover what's interesting in it. It’s a long process. Some music grabs you right away, and other music can take years to fully appreciate. It took me many years to learn to like Peking Opera. I used to think it was horrible! I didn’t like those sounds at all.
There was once an arts festival in Amsterdam, and they asked me to invite Chinese artists for a concert. They wanted us to include Peking Opera. I knew nothing about it, so I contacted a colleague, who was a specialist in Chinese opera. I asked him to recommend good groups. We went to China to visit them.
While we were there, we heard everything from Shanghai yangge troupes to Kunqu in Suzhou and Nanjing. I found it all really fascinating. I remember one rehearsal in Shanghai, where the actors were not in costume or makeup, just rehearsing. Somehow that made it possible to concentrate just on on what was musically happening there, and I saw Antoinet sitting opposite me, and she began to cry. I asked, “What’s wrong?” She said, “Nothing’s wrong. The music is so beautiful.” I was really amazed, but it also sort of electrified my eyes and my ears. Gradually, I was really taken in by it.
That rehearsal featured a very famous Peking Opera performer, Shang Changrong. It was many years ago, but he was truly fantastic.
Later, we interviewed many performers and learned a lot about how instruments cooperate with the singers. I became a Peking Opera fan!
When people organize Peking Opera performances in places like Cologne or Amsterdam, they often ask me, “Can you do a 10-minute spoken introduction for the audience before the show?” You know, if I have to do an introduction to Chinese opera, I don’t want to tell people about the role patterns, about face paintings. That’s knowledge from the textbook, but it doesn’t bring the music to life.
If you want to understand music, you have to feel it. So I usually try to sing a little phrase of Peking Opera, or get the audience to sing along. Of course, we don’t do it well with just six words per line, and all those inflections in the melody. It’s very hard. But we try!
Then we bring in the percussion. Westerners are used to learning melodies. They sing slowly and solemnly, like church music. But then we suddenly get the Chinese percussion coming in, like da-da-da-da! This extremely fast rhythm completely throws them off. They’ll think: “How is this even music?” But then they start to wonder that maybe it’s like jazz? Lively, free, flexible, full of elasticity.
Different people have different ways of listening. But when you have that phrase in the Peking Opera coming up, everybody goes mad. They start applauding and there is a real communication with what is what’s happening on stage.
So no, music is a universal language. But understanding it is extremely important.
Dong Kui: In China, a lot of conservatories and organizations are working on collecting and archiving folk songs. It’s kind of a national project.
Hong Wang: Yes, they’re trying to conduct surveys and document the current state of folk and traditional music. But we also need to reflect more deeply, where exactly is the music?
Frank Kouwenhoven: Right. It’s great that we can collect as much as we can. If they’re recorded and carefully archived, that has real value.
But the real question is that, what do we actually learn from this? Have we studied the lyrics deeply? Do we truly understand the meaning behind the songs?
For example, Western anthropologists often claim that Chinese rice culture, unlike other parts of Asia, doesn’t have any gods. But that’s simply not true. Nobody ever cared to investigate those folk songs well enough to find out what is actually happening there. There is ample references to the rice made, and the “rice mother” all kinds of rituals that take. So the truth remains hidden.
We need to investigate: where are these songs performed? Who sings them? These questions are far more important than simply collecting more songs to put in our pockets.
That said, there are many brilliant musicologists in China doing great work. They ask the relevant questions and penetrate into the local repertoire deeply. I’ve learned a lot from them. They’re real experts in their fields.
Hong Wang: Yes, we’ve gathered so much folk music. It shouldn't just sit in the library.
Frank Kouwenhoven: Absolutely. But I also see a lot of improvement. Young students today are more aware. They’re eager to do fieldwork, to go to remote places, and they’re asking sharper questions with more imagination, too.
Those Reflections: “Who Am I?”
Dong Kui: You once told me that after visiting China, you actually realize what your own culture is. Could you say more about that?
Frank Kouwenhoven: I'm surprised you ask that. Because honestly, I think you could answer that question better than I can.
Obviously, I wasn’t a sinologist when I started. I had to go deep into all aspects of Chinese culture. I read obsessively to try to understand China’s historical development. I wanted to make sense of what I was seeing in the countryside, of the fantastic water landscapes in Jiangnan. Where did they come from? When did it all start?
I believed that clever thinking must lie behind all these questions. So I read anthropology, history, sociology, musicology for five or six years. In the end, I really did become a sinologist, a scholar of Chinese music.
And I thought, wow, this is incredible!
I have almost never read a book on Western history. I’ve never even read a book on Dutch history. I realized I needed to address my own culture too. Who am I? I should investigate not just how they think, but how I think.
In a way, I’m deeply grateful to China. It taught me so much about Western culture. It taught me about the meaning of being human, not just as a Westerner, but as a Dutchman.
It’s an ongoing process. I’m spending more time learning Chinese, and also reflecting on my own languages. What’s different between Dutch, English, and Chinese? When I draft an article in Dutch or English that I’ll later publish in Chinese, I realize I’m not just translating. I’m reconstructing my way of thinking.
Yes, it’s a two-way process. That’s what makes my experience in China so meaningful.
All right! Great! Can I ask who is Frank Kouwenhoven now?
Dong Kui: Through studying Chinese music, you gained clarity about yourself. Let me ask you something else. Last time in Amsterdam, we talked about my music. Could you share your thoughts again? It might help me reflect as a composer.
Frank Kouwenhoven: I remember asking you what kind of composer you wanted to be. You said you hoped to become a Chinese composer. But actually, that’s a question of double identity, because you live in the U.S.
I remember that you gave me a CD of your work with a distinctly Chinese flavor. I found them interesting, and there are some really nice pieces there. They might not sound extremely “Chinese” because there are no Chinese instruments involved or Chinese type of singing or Chinese words. But I believe, that we’re first and foremost human beings. Whatever our race, language, or passport, those things matter probably less than who you are as an individual.
Some things don’t need to be worn like a flag. They emerge naturally.
Dong Kui: I sometimes ask myself, “Who am I?” As a composer, I’ve just finished a new piece that’s about to premiere. I’m also one of the speakers. The organizer asked me to talk about myself and my music. Suddenly, I had no idea what to say. Isn’t the music enough?
Frank Kouwenhoven: If you’re panicking or thinking, “Oh no, I don’t know what to say about my own music,” then let the music speak. That means it already has weight. It stands on its own. Talking won’t make it better.
What makes music good? If you talk for five hours and the music is bad, it won’t help. But if it’s good music, you don’t need to say anything. Everyone will just say, “Wow, that was amazing.”
I think that kind of non-conscious attitude towards what you make is the best. Like the folk singers I admire,they’re not trying to construct their songs for you. They’re just singing. Maybe it’s a song that’s been passed down,but they’ll still say, “This is my song.” Because it comes from their voice and their body.
To me, that is the essence of music.
Zang Na: Exactly. Music can also just be itself. It can speak for itself. Just like how Professor Dong reflects on her identity as a composer. In a way, we’re all answering the same question: “Who I am”
Epilogue: On Interviews, Journals, and Other Things
Dong Kui: Today’s interview has been incredibly rewarding. Frank, let me take a moment to tell you about our arts criticism project. So far, we’ve interviewed several overseas artists and researchers. The goal of this project has always been to foster in-depth dialogue around cultural, artistic, and musical topics.
Zang Na: Yes, Professor Dong was actually the first person we interviewed, nine years ago now. We met back then in Silicon Valley, California. The conversation sparked a lot of inspiration. We realized this format allowed for a more open and distinctive kind of research.
Dong Kui: Later, Hong Wang joined us. As you know, he’s a multi-instrumentalist with tons of creative ideas. Each year, we interview artists and scholars, then publish selected discussions as articles in professional journals. It’s a bit like anthropological work, and very interesting and meaningful. And we’re going to keep doing it!
Speaking of publications, you founded the Chime journal on Chinese music studies in Europe over 30 years ago. I know it's an academic journal, but could you tell us more about it?
Frank Kouwenhoven: Chime mainly publishes ethnomusicology articles, but we also occasionally include pieces that lean more toward sociology or anthropology. Our budget is quite limited, so we have to manage it carefully to keep everything running: our annual conferences, the website, and of course the editing and publication of the journal itself.
For many years, our archive was housed in the Leiden Library. But the cost became too high. So we eventually moved our collection—books and recordings—to Heidelberg University, where they had the funding to begin digitizing the materials. That was a very satisfying development.
Zang Na: Digitization makes it so much easier to preserve and access large volumes of research materials. That’s great!
Frank Kouwenhoven: There’s a funny story, actually. Some students from the U.S. wanted to do research on me and my wife. So they went to Heidelberg, and there they found all the recordings, including ones of my wife playing erhu with her teacher. I never even knew those recordings existed! After digitizing, Heidelberg sent them back to us. It was really amusing.
In any case, it means that Heidelberg is now safeguarding this material, and the process will take years to complete. We're talking about a massive amount of material!
And there’s more, we donated all our musical instruments to the Museum for Science and Culture of Macau, in Lisbon. It's a wonderful museum focused on Chinese culture. They held an exhibition later on, and I was completely surprised by the sizeable collection. We really had invested a lot over the years!
Right now, our website, annual conference, journal, and newsletter are still running well. I really hope all of this can continue into the future.
Dong Kui: Do you manage all of this yourself? Or do you have assistants helping you?
Frank Kouwenhoven: I’ve invited PhD students working on Chinese music to help me with various tasks. But I’m aware that I’m already 68 years old. What happens to the journal if someday I’m no longer here?
So we’ve put out a call for people who care about this work, to form a circulating board of directors, each serving for two to three years. That way, the journal can keep going. A lot of people are interested, so I’m hopeful it will continue.
As for fieldwork, I want to emphasize that our journal has always functioned a bit like a news magazine. We do peer-reviewed academic articles, but we also include interviews with composers, and fieldwork reports that are more narrative than scholarly. We simply document what people encounter in the field. In that sense, maybe we’ve been something of a pioneer.
At the same time, we maintain a critical perspective on academic research itself. I believe that’s one of our core values.
Interviewee —
Frank Kouwenhoven: Dutch sinologist and editor-in-chief of Chime, a European journal dedicated to the study of Chinese music.
Photos courtesy of Frank Kouwenhoven.
中文原文
整理撰稿:臧娜
荷兰汉学家高文厚先生(Frank 弗兰克)从20世纪80年代开始在中国进行田野采风,对中国传统音乐,包括中国少数民族音乐有切身体会和深入思考。他在欧洲创办的中国音乐研究刊物《磬》Chime 已经有30多年的历史,作为一个音乐类学术刊物,为传播、总结、研究中国音乐做出了一定贡献。斗转星移,时间来到了20世纪20年代中期,高先生和老友作曲家董夔教授、好莱坞音乐制作人汪洪,以及文化学者臧娜相聚一堂,忆往昔、看今朝,思绪飞扬。希望以高先生数十年研究经验为基础进行的比较文化思考,共同推动当代中国音乐发展。
那些年:“田野”工作趣谈
董夔:高文厚老师,你好!我们准备了好几个问题,让我们从你在中国做的田野考察说起吧!你来中国做了好多次音乐方面的田野考察,哪一次给你留下的印象最深呢?
高文厚:可以说,每一次印象都很深刻,我从未失望过。记得1986年的时候,我的妻子施聶姐(Antoinet)还在南京大学学习,我计划去中国加入到她的田野工作之中。我跟我妻子是在荷兰相遇的,我们都是音乐发烧友,在音乐方面有共同的兴趣,但那时候我们对西方音乐比对中国音乐更感兴趣。后来,她去南京学习,想研究中国音乐,包括中国的作词技巧。
那是上个世纪,我刚到中国的时候,对这个国家一无所知。我最担心的是我根本不会说中文,到北京的时候,我连怎么去洗手间都不会说,这对我来说简直是一次历险。
当时施聶姐来接我,她通过了海关,在那里等我,我们拥抱在一起。可她告诉我她的护照没带在身上,海关官员非常惊讶地看着她,但他们还是让她走了。所以,我觉得那是一个非常友好的国家,而且人民非常闲适,感觉像在家里一样,我认为我会在那里找到自己的位置。
开始几年的经历非常棒,我被田野工作彻底征服!但是我不懂的事情还有很多,比如我们收集的歌曲、歌词,还有跟我们谈话的人。这些都跟我所知道的世界完全不一样,文化上也不同。记得那是一个特别寒冷的冬天,我们决定去云南休个短假。如果你问我,什么让我印象最为深刻,应该是那里的乡村生活。云南是一个温暖美丽的地方,女人们打扮很漂亮,穿着奇异的服装在田地里劳作。当然,没有人期待她们这样做,但他们就这样做了。顺便说一下,那些可爱的女人,每次我想给她们拍照,她们都不愿意,直接跑开了。我想,用余生去旅行,见不同的人,跟他们聊天,这太让人着迷了。
那时距离现在已经快40年时间了,但是我的热情并没有消逝。当时我和我妻子还认识了汪洪,合作进行了田野考察工作。
董夔:汪老师,你曾经跟高老师一起去采风,能跟我们讲讲吗?
汪洪:是的,我那时候在国内一个艺术研究所做编辑工作,做中国民族民间音乐集成省分卷的记谱和校对。问题是,我们在学校里学习的也是西方音乐,虽然我从小学的是民乐器二胡,但是大学期间让我改学了双簧管(Oboe),所以当时我对民间音乐的了解也非常有限。第一次听江苏南通僮子戏的时候,我都不知道那是什么,但几个月后,我慢慢爱上了这种音乐,这是一种纯正的中国音乐。之后,我很幸运有机会在南京大学教海外学生学习中国音乐,认识了曾经在南大学习的施聂姐和来访的高文厚老师。
高文厚:是的,我跟很多海外学者合作过,否则我们就不会有机会见面,一起去苏州采风。汪洪还记得我们在苏州的田野工作吗?当时你还在做民间音乐集成,给我们分享了很多。但这里我想分享的是一个跟音乐无关的故事,也是一个疯狂的故事。我们当时在太湖边,湖边的绿树上种着橙子,湖水看起来好像大海。我跟施聶姐都想游泳,于是我们走进水里,但是水很浅,我们不得不再往前走。我们都没有穿泳衣,所有的人都围观我们,认为这两个人太疯狂了!
汪洪:很简单,他们以为你掉到水里了。
高文厚:在岸边的森林里,你到处都能听到劳作的歌声,号子。那里的人们喜欢唱歌。可以说,大多数方言歌曲研究都是在农业活动最早开始的区域展开的,这是世界性的。当时我矗立的那片土地同样拥有不可思议的历史,它集中保有了体现中国音乐文化根脉的歌曲,我很难想象这种音乐形式是如何从原始状态发展而来的。那些民间音乐艺人可以自由地、艺术地改造他们的音乐,音乐中充满了来自他们内心的力量。虽然我不能理解那些歌词,但是他们的声音很动人,而且这些音乐和它们所处的环境是无法被录制和重现的。
董夔:1986年是你到中国的第一次田野考察,那么在Covid之前最后一次的田野考察是什么时候呢?
高文厚:我在疫情前去中国做过短途考察,汪洪也专门陪我们去采风。我们在扬州采访了扬州清曲和扬州弹词的艺人和扬剧主胡大师卢小杰,还去南京拜访了音乐学者。
我和施聶姐曾经在甘肃做过10年的田野项目,之后她去世了,这太可惜了!甚至在她去世前,我们还讨论了我们在实地工作中的某些观察结果,她希望我能够继续下去。
事实上,我妻子去世后,我甚至不确定是否会再回到中国,因为她是我的翻译,她中文比我流利很多,我从她那里学到了一些,但是我还是不够精通。也许我还能回到那里的农村,但那对我的要求太高了,你知道我会被那些方言弄得晕头转向。
2016年左右,我带了一个中国朋友回到甘肃。我们参加了一个庙会活动,在采访过程中,我发现我听不懂那些人说的话,他们喋喋不休,甚至我的中国朋友也听不懂,那里方言太多了。但是,我很高兴能迈出这一步,如果可以的话,我会继续下去。
那些人:逝去的挽歌
董夔:能够继续下去太好了!那么,与上世纪八十年代相比,你觉得现在田野考察中的中国有什么变化呢?你应该有很多切身感受。
高文厚:跟四十年前比,现在的中国充满活力,她的发展如此迅速,令人难以置信。但很多传统文化在过去几十年间逐渐消失了,包括音乐。我曾经回到江南录制民歌,发现很多素材已经没有了,人们唱给你听的,或是石化了的版本,或是他们在学校学到的歌曲版本。但这不是一回事儿!你知道的,他们学的是固定版本的歌曲,有点像你创作的音乐。他们可能是用数字、记谱法或其他方法学会的,但他们每次演唱时都会再现同样的歌词、同样的旋律。而任何民谣歌手都不会这样做,他们从未以完全相同的方式重现过他们的歌曲,因为那些音乐是动态的,是活的,是即兴创作的。
在江南,这种情况已经很普遍了。在甘肃,比如我们参观的庙会,20世纪90年代就有,但现在它变得更像是一种旅游活动,很多外面的人来参观,还有各种舞台表演。然而,那些被组织起来的活动与庙会的整个原始框架并没有多大关系,所以,我真的觉得,很多有趣的东西正在消失。
董夔:你说的情况其实不只发生在中国,也是世界性的。而且,随着我们迈入科技时代,这个进程会发展得更快。高老师,你认为这种由科技推动的进程,是积极的还是消极的?这个突然冒出来的问题太有意思了!
高文厚:你知道,我对传统文化的大量流失感到悲伤!因为它是真实的,它真的会说话!
我在城市里看到的很多文化都很虚假、肤浅、毫无意义。当然,西方也有这样的文化,这一点无可争议。是的,传统必然会消亡,文化需要重塑自身、重新进化、重新匹配,这是一个自然的过程,也是一个好的过程。但是,我打心底里难过,主要是为死去的人们难过。
我一直觉得施聶姐就在我的内心深处,我不是指任何浪漫的意思,我只想说,我们在一起的时间太长了,以至于我感觉我一直在和她交流,或者和云朵或天堂对话。我很清楚她在某种情况下会说什么,会想什么,这在我心里有种回荡。所以,我失去的不仅仅是我的妻子。
还有跟我们一起录制过音乐的所有歌手,我们建立的友谊和密切的联系,都随着这些人的离去消失了。老实讲,对我来说,他们的离去比歌曲的消失更糟糕!
我觉得现在很多民间音乐只存在于某所音乐学院或音乐系,在某些老师的指导下。而这是一个非常狭窄的空间,文化不可能在狭窄的空间里发展。你必须在室内打开窗户,必须有交流。传统必须改变,并且实现自我更新。
我认为传统文化中就有这种东西。因为那时的人们确实在旅行,他们确实在以一种非常自然的方式互相交流、分享。这是一种处于萌芽状态的文化(low-key culture),它没有受到很多政治因素的影响,更加自然地发展。这些年,我更多关注上海等大城市,那里有有趣的艺术家、迷人的音乐家,但我认为他们发展得很不容易,无法拥有跟农村人一样的自然发展空间。
董夔:我对田野采风的记忆,要追溯到我在音乐学院当学生的时候。当时,我们在寒暑假期间都会出去旅行,我记得我们在云南一个山顶上偶然遇到了一场葬礼。我在那里呆了一整晚,那里有一群上了年纪的老太太,她们的歌声就像召唤灵魂一样,或者说把灵魂送上天堂。虽然我不记得具体的旋律,但我记得它的质感,还有那个环境,我总是能通过回忆从中获得创作的灵感,因为它让我感动!
汪洪:传统的流逝确实让人痛惜!我在北京期间,一位知名音乐制作人卢中强,邀请我为北京十三月文化传播和中国唱片集团共同打造的“国乐复兴计划”做一些录音项目。这些项目是与不同国家的音乐家合作,用不同的音乐语言对话,录制了一批非常有创意的新国风作品。
通过这些工作,你会发现传统音乐的重要性,以及要恢复传统音乐,必须去做田野采风。比如我去了贵州、内蒙古等地做音乐采录。我还跟一位忘年交的蒙古族在读大学生那琴有过这类的交谈,当然从交谈中我也了解到很多我所不知道的少数民族音乐,同时我也鼓励她多去鄂尔多斯家乡做田野工作。她跟我说疫情时第一次考博没有通过,我说别担心,先回老家去,是老天爷给你时间下去采风。她后来真去采访了一位知名的民间艺人,还因为疫情被困在老艺人家,暂时留在那里深入学习。目前她已经回到中央民族大学读博,那段田野工作的经历一定很有价值。
那些事:高文厚与京剧
董夔:你的妻子是一位汉学家,你们决定收集民歌,你好像很喜欢中国少数民族音乐。从你的角度看,你如何界定中国少数民族音乐呢?它有什么不同于汉族音乐的地方吗?
高文厚:我不大喜欢做这样的区分,因为会产生误解。我觉得那些生活在中国特定地区的人,可以根据服饰、食物、语言来辨认他们。汉族的多样性也远不止于此。如果我去甘肃,那里的人会说,这是个外国人,但他们也不一定会把来自上海的人视为自己人。
中国非常区域化,如果你认真发掘,我认为在中国至少有上百个少数民族。他们有时相互交融,有时又互相区隔,你必须发掘。可以说,哪里都有瑰丽的文化。
董夔:在中国常常听说中国传统音乐就是世界的,大家认为中国音乐是世界的,还是有音乐方言的呢?
汪洪:我经常对音乐的概念感到困惑,你知道什么是音乐吗?你为什么不是每天都听爱尔兰音乐,或者每天都听蒙古音乐?因为你不熟悉这种语言。所以每个人都有自己喜欢的音乐语言。
高文厚:对,我想说的是,音乐不是一种通用语言。就像语言一样,语言也是一个巨大的领域,有许多不同的语言,你可以称之为方言。
了解任何类型的音乐都需要一些投入。你需要去了解它的具体内容,学习如何喜欢它,或发现它的有趣之处。这是一个漫长的过程,有些音乐很快就会吸引你,而另一些音乐你需要很长时间才能渗入其中。我花了很多年才开始欣赏京剧,我以前觉得那太可怕了!我不喜欢那些声音!
当时有一个阿姆斯特丹(Amsterdam)艺术节,委托我邀请中国的艺术家们参加音乐会表演,他们让我们准备京剧,可我对京剧一无所知,于是我联系了我的一个同事,他是戏曲专家。我请他帮忙推荐一些好的京剧团体,我们去中国拜访他们。而且在中国期间,我们听到了来自上海的秧歌队,也听到了来自苏州和南京的昆曲,真的很吸引人。我记得当时在上海排练,听的是没有穿演出服装的京剧排练,演员也不需要化妆。听着听着,我看到坐在我对面的施聶姐开始哭泣。我问她,你怎么了?她说没什么,只是音乐太美了。我真的很惊讶,这激活了我的眼睛和耳朵,我慢慢真的被吸引住了。那是一位有名的京剧表演艺术家,尚长荣。虽然这是很多年前的事了,但他真的很棒!
后来,我们采访了很多表演者,学到了很多关于乐器如何与表演者合作的知识。我成了京剧迷!
当有人在科隆或阿姆斯特丹的音乐厅里组织京剧演出时,他们总会问:"在表演开始前,我们能和观众有10分钟的交流吗?”你知道,我不想告诉人们角色模式、脸部彩绘之类的事情。因为这些都是书本上的知识,但并不能带来音乐。如果你想理解音乐,你就必须去感受它。所以我总是试着唱一小段,或者和观众一起唱。当然,我们很难表演得很好,比如仅仅六个字一句的唱词,再加上旋律中的各种转折,真的很难。但我们尝试过了!
然后我们再在唱段里面加入打击乐。你知道西方人必须学会旋律,他们唱得很慢,很庄严,就像教堂音乐一样。这时候,如果突然加入中国打击乐的声音,就像板鼓哒哒哒哒,这种非常快的节奏,他们会十分不理解,会想,这怎么能混合在一起呢?然后,他们会思考,这是否就像爵士乐一样,如此活泼,如此自由,如此灵活,如此有弹性?每个人的听觉感受可能完全不同,但当京剧中的某段唱词出现时(有字幕),他们都会疯狂地鼓掌,与舞台上发生的一切产生真正的交流。
所以,我认为音乐不是一种通用语言,但是对某种音乐的理解非常重要。
董夔:关于音乐语言的学习和积累,中国很多音乐学院和组织都在做,比如民歌的收集、归档工作。
汪洪:是的,他们试图对民族民间音乐的状况进行调查,但是我们需要更多地思考这个问题,“音乐”在哪里?
高文厚:对,我们可以尽可能多地收集到更多不同的曲调,这很好。如果它们真的被一丝不苟地记录下来,并且有录音,那么这肯定有价值。
但问题是我们最终知道了什么?我们是否对这些材料进行了深入研究,是否读懂了歌词里写的东西,是否更好地理解了这些歌曲的内容?
比如西方人类学关于中国的研究,总是说与亚洲其他地区不同,中国的稻米文化中不存在神。但事实根本不是这样。在民歌中,有大量关于稻米制作、稻米之母的各种仪式的记载,可从来没有人关心过这些民谣,以至于无法了解其中的真实情况。所以我们必须对其进行调查,包括人们在哪里演唱,是谁在唱,等等。这比我们究竟收集到了多少歌曲并把它们装进口袋更重要。
另一方面,中国也有很多快乐的音乐学家,他们的工作非常出色。他们能够提出相关的问题,并且深入研究当地的曲目。他们是我学习的好榜样,因为这些人对他们研究的领域有深入的了解。
汪洪:是的,我们收集了这么多的民族民间音乐,不能让它们总是被放在图书馆里。
高文厚:另一方面,我看到了很多进步。很多年轻学生的意识有了很大提高。他们乐于做田野考察,乐于去远的地方,并且有更敏锐的问题意识和更多的奇思妙想。
那些思考:“我是谁?”
董夔:你曾经跟我说过,在你访问中国之后,你反而更加了解自己国家的文化。你能详细说说吗?
高文厚:我很惊讶你会问这个问题,因为我觉得你自己就能很好地回答这个问题。
显然,你知道我以前并不是汉学家。所以我必须真正深入了解中国的各个方面。我疯狂地阅读书籍,希望了解中国的历史发展。我希望自己能够理解我在乡村看到的东西,了解江南那些奇妙的水景,它们来自哪里?什么时候开始的?我相信,所有这些问题背后都有绝妙的思考。所以,我大量阅读人类学、历史学、社会学、音乐学书籍,一读就是五六年。结果,我真的成了一名汉学家,成了一名中国音乐学家。
我觉得,天哪,这太神奇了!
我几乎从来没有读过关于西方历史的书,从来没有读过一本关于荷兰历史的书。我想至少应该试着解决我自己的文化问题,包括我是谁?我应该尝试调查研究,不仅调查他们是怎么想的,也应该调查我自己是怎么想的。
可以说,我非常感谢中国,它教会了我很多关于西方文化的知识,也教会了我很多关于做人的意义。不仅仅是西方人,也包括荷兰人。
这是一个持续的过程。我正在花更多的时间学习中文,并且反思我自己的语言,它和中文有什么不同。我用英语或荷兰语来起草我即将用中文发表的论文,我意识到这背后有很多不同的思维方式,而这些是无法靠翻译来完成的。我基本上是重塑我的表达方式,我也开始反观自己的想法和我的整个思考过程。是的,这是一个双向的过程。这也让我的中国之行变得更加有趣。
那么,现在请问高文厚是谁?
董夔:你通过研究中国音乐看清了自己。那我要问问你,上次我在阿姆斯特丹见到你,我们讨论了我的作品,你可以再谈谈你对这些作品的看法么?帮助一位作曲家反观自己。
高文厚:关于你,我记得当我问你想成为什么样的作曲家时,你说曾经想成为一名中国作曲家。其实,这是双重身份问题,因为你在美国。
我记得你给过我一张 CD。里面有你写的更有中国味道的作品,它们很有趣,有一些非常好的作品。虽然它们可能不那么中国化,因为没有中国乐器的参与,或者没有中国式的演唱。但我相信,我们首先是人,无论我们在种族、语言、护照方面有怎样的差异,所有这些东西可能都比不上你作为一个个体所拥有的东西重要。
有些东西不需要像旗帜一样挂在外面,是自然而然的。
董夔:我会偶尔问自己,“你是谁?”作为一个作曲家,我刚刚完成的作品马上就要首演了,我是主讲人之一。主办人让我谈谈我自己和我的音乐。我突然进入了一种不知说什么好的状态,不就是表演我的音乐吗?为什么还要我来说呢?
高文厚:如果你惊慌失措,或者在想,“天哪,我不知道该如何谈论我自己的音乐”,那就让大家听听吧,因为这意味着音乐已经有它自己的重量了。它就在那里,说出来也不会让它变得更好。
音乐好在哪里?如果你讲了五个小时,可音乐本身很烂,那讲也没用;但如果是好的音乐,你根本不用讲,每个人听完都会说,“哇!这首曲子很棒”。我认为这种非自觉的状态最好。就像我所欣赏的那些民歌歌者,他们并不是非要做什么,他们只是在唱歌,可能唱的是别人唱过的歌,但他们还是会说,这是我的歌,因为他们唱的歌来自他们的声音和他们自身。我认为这才是音乐的根本所在。
臧娜:是呀,音乐也可以做自己,可以为自己发声,就好像董老师对自己作曲家身份问题的思考。大家都在回答一个问题,“我是谁?”
尾声:关于访谈、刊物及其他
董夔:今天的采访真的收获很大。高老师,我顺便跟你介绍一下我们这个艺术评论项目。我们的艺术评论项目到目前为止已经采访了多位海外艺术家和研究人员,当然,进行这个项目的初衷是想围绕文化艺术和音乐话题,进行一些真正有深度的讨论。
臧娜:是的,董老师是我们的第一位被采访者。那已经是9年前了,当时我们在加州硅谷碰面,聊天中碰撞出很多火花,觉得这是一种比较自由和独特的研究方式。
董夔:后来汪洪老师也加入了我们,你知道他是一个多乐器演奏家,有很多奇思妙想。我们就这样每年采访一些艺术家和学者,然后在专业刊物上发表一些文章。这有点像人类学工作,很有趣,也很有意义。我们会继续下去!
说到刊物,你在欧洲创办的中国音乐研究刊物《磬》Chime 已经有30多年了。我知道它是一个音乐学杂志,能介绍一下吗?
高文厚:这本杂志主要收录音乐学文章,有时我们也会收录一些更侧重于社会学或人类学的文章。我们运营杂志的经费很少,所以必须非常明智地去管理它们,才能维持每年的年会、网站运营以及期刊的编辑这些事情。
我们的资料库立足于莱顿图书馆(Leiden Library)已经很多年了,但是成本太高。后来我们把收集到的书籍和录音资料送到了海德堡大学(Heidelberg University),他们有足够的资金进行数字化处理,这非常令人满意。
臧娜:数字化处理有利于大量数据资料的保存和查找,很好嘛!
高文厚:有一个很有趣的例子,一些来自美国的学生想对我和我妻子进行研究,他们去了海德堡,在那里找到了所有的录音,包括我妻子和她的老师一起演奏二胡的录音。可我从来不知道有这些录音。海德堡那边把这些东西数字化之后,又寄了回来,这很有趣。但无论如何,这意味着海德堡大学会好好保管这些资料,这将是一个耗时很多年的过程。要知道,这可是一大堆材料呀!
还有我们的乐器,我们把它们都捐给了里斯本(Lisbon)的澳门科学文化博物馆(Museum for Science and Culture of Macau),一个非常不错的博物馆,主要展示中国文化。他们后来举办了一次展览,我完全惊讶于自己这么多年来如此庞大的收藏,我们在这方面确实投入了不少钱。
目前,我们网站、年会、期刊和通讯还在正常运行,我希望所有这些都能延续下去。
董夔:这些都是由你来管理吗?还是有助理来做这些事情呢?
高文厚:我邀请了中国音乐方面的博士生来协助做各种工作。但我也意识到自己已经 68岁了,如果我有朝一日不在了,这个杂志怎么办?所以我们向有志于此的人发出呼吁,让他们做一个为期两到三年的循环董事会。这样,这本杂志能够一直存在下去。当然很多人都很感兴趣,所以我相信我们可以继续下去。
另外,在田野考察方面,我想强调的是,我们的刊物一直充当着新闻杂志的角色。我们不仅对文章进行同行评议,还对作曲家进行访谈,撰写不那么具有学术性的田野工作报告。但我们只是对人们在田野中遇到的事情进行记录。所以从这个意义上说,我们也许是先驱者;同时,对学术研究持批判态度,我认为这正是我们要遵循的原则。
被采访人——
高文厚:荷兰汉学家,欧洲中国音乐研究刊物《磬》Chime主编。
Originally published in Art Panorama, No. 4, 2025, pp. 127–131.
原载于《艺术广角》,2025年第4期,第127–131页。